<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bruuuuuuuuce</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.unlikelywords.com/2007/10/31/bruuuuuuuuce/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.unlikelywords.com/2007/10/31/bruuuuuuuuce/</link>
	<description>A blog with delusions of grandeur.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 11:11:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rachel</title>
		<link>http://www.unlikelywords.com/2007/10/31/bruuuuuuuuce/#comment-17219</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 04:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unlikelywords.com/2007/10/31/bruuuuuuuuce/#comment-17219</guid>
		<description>I'm not an enormous Springsteen fan (sorry, Leigh), but this whole thing really makes me want to buy his album.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not an enormous Springsteen fan (sorry, Leigh), but this whole thing really makes me want to buy his album.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: leigh</title>
		<link>http://www.unlikelywords.com/2007/10/31/bruuuuuuuuce/#comment-16703</link>
		<dc:creator>leigh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 16:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unlikelywords.com/2007/10/31/bruuuuuuuuce/#comment-16703</guid>
		<description>OK, I've consulted Wikipedia for some help in my statistics.  In 1992, the government (FCC) relaxed radio ownership rules. Until 1992, a company could only own up to two stations per market. Clear Channel took advantage (as any good company might) of this relaxed policy. Within 3 years, they owned 43 radio stations and 16 TV stations.  Then in 1996, something called the Telecommunications Act was passed, allowing companies to own/run even more stations. They expanded their ownership to 1200 (yes one thousand and two hundred) radio stations around the country. Thus destroying local radio. When they decide a song is bad, it is banned on 1200 radio stations. I do not know what % of radio stations and other entertainment (TV, etc) they own of total in the US. I also know that recently they have been selling some of their assets. There are other large companies also responsible for this problem - Infinity Broadcasting is another. What I do know is that ownership of so many radio stations around the country greatly contributed to a loss of regional individuality. In addition, they destroyed historically local progressive and passionate radio stations. There used to be a culture following radio personalities - as a kid, I knew every DJ on my local station - I knew what their favorite music was, when their shows were on - I listened religiously - I personally watched that radio station be eaten alive by large corporate takeover.  In conclusion of this rant, I would have to blame the government for relaxing regulations, but the companies for being super-companies and good at business????? Ugh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, I&#8217;ve consulted Wikipedia for some help in my statistics.  In 1992, the government (FCC) relaxed radio ownership rules. Until 1992, a company could only own up to two stations per market. Clear Channel took advantage (as any good company might) of this relaxed policy. Within 3 years, they owned 43 radio stations and 16 TV stations.  Then in 1996, something called the Telecommunications Act was passed, allowing companies to own/run even more stations. They expanded their ownership to 1200 (yes one thousand and two hundred) radio stations around the country. Thus destroying local radio. When they decide a song is bad, it is banned on 1200 radio stations. I do not know what % of radio stations and other entertainment (TV, etc) they own of total in the US. I also know that recently they have been selling some of their assets. There are other large companies also responsible for this problem - Infinity Broadcasting is another. What I do know is that ownership of so many radio stations around the country greatly contributed to a loss of regional individuality. In addition, they destroyed historically local progressive and passionate radio stations. There used to be a culture following radio personalities - as a kid, I knew every DJ on my local station - I knew what their favorite music was, when their shows were on - I listened religiously - I personally watched that radio station be eaten alive by large corporate takeover.  In conclusion of this rant, I would have to blame the government for relaxing regulations, but the companies for being super-companies and good at business????? Ugh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: leigh</title>
		<link>http://www.unlikelywords.com/2007/10/31/bruuuuuuuuce/#comment-16696</link>
		<dc:creator>leigh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 15:51:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unlikelywords.com/2007/10/31/bruuuuuuuuce/#comment-16696</guid>
		<description>clearchannel has ruined radio. don't get me started.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>clearchannel has ruined radio. don&#8217;t get me started.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
