<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Diebold Still Sucks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.unlikelywords.com/2008/01/10/diebold-still-sucks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.unlikelywords.com/2008/01/10/diebold-still-sucks/</link>
	<description>A blog with delusions of grandeur.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 05:33:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rachel</title>
		<link>http://www.unlikelywords.com/2008/01/10/diebold-still-sucks/#comment-38548</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 16:06:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unlikelywords.com/2008/01/10/diebold-still-sucks/#comment-38548</guid>
		<description>I agree with you -- clearly we need a voting system that has the confidence of the electorate, because otherwise there won't be any trust in the outcome even when, such as in cases like this, there isn't any really good evidence to support hacking or cheating. Since people's current confidence levels render just about every election disputable, we're setting ourselves up for a neverending waste of time and money (among other, perhaps worse consequences) if we don't solve the problem at a basic level. 

My proposal is that only my vote will count. That'll make recounts really quick and easy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you &#8212; clearly we need a voting system that has the confidence of the electorate, because otherwise there won&#8217;t be any trust in the outcome even when, such as in cases like this, there isn&#8217;t any really good evidence to support hacking or cheating. Since people&#8217;s current confidence levels render just about every election disputable, we&#8217;re setting ourselves up for a neverending waste of time and money (among other, perhaps worse consequences) if we don&#8217;t solve the problem at a basic level. </p>
<p>My proposal is that only my vote will count. That&#8217;ll make recounts really quick and easy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AC</title>
		<link>http://www.unlikelywords.com/2008/01/10/diebold-still-sucks/#comment-37914</link>
		<dc:creator>AC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 19:30:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unlikelywords.com/2008/01/10/diebold-still-sucks/#comment-37914</guid>
		<description>http://dhinmi.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/1/10/02623/2264/85/434176</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://dhinmi.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/1/10/02623/2264/85/434176" rel="nofollow">http://dhinmi.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/1/10/02623/2264/85/434176</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
